|
|
Post by acidohm on Apr 9, 2024 4:30:42 GMT
I have already written the letter. Dear Dr Mann I am sending you some databases that you may find interesting. Or not ... as they don't seem to support your primary thesis that human CO2 emissions are the primary culprit for recent global warming. However, as a "good" scientist, I have at least some faith that you will give them a dispassionate evaluation, as all good scientists will. I look forward to your response.
With all due professional regards. Missouriboy.
Can't wait to hear his response ...... He just blocks people, I never so much as replied to anything on his "X" page....I'm blocked anyway! He must have people working for him just blocking away....or....he's doing it instead of research 🤔 |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Apr 9, 2024 5:05:58 GMT
Can't wait to hear his response ...... He just blocks people, I never so much as replied to anything on his "X" page....I'm blocked anyway! He must have people working for him just blocking away....or....he's doing it instead of research 🤔 Must be a Left Guard athletic/research assistantship.  |
|
|
|
Post by duwayne on Apr 9, 2024 16:47:27 GMT
I have already written the letter.
Dear Dr Mann I am sending you some databases that you may find interesting. Or not ... as they don't seem to support your primary thesis that human CO2 emissions are the primary culprit for recent global warming. However, as a "good" scientist, I have at least some faith that you will give them a dispassionate evaluation, as all good scientists will. I look forward to your response.
With all due professional regards. Missouriboy.
I suggest you sign it Dr. Missouriboy or he won't read it. |
|
|
|
Post by tyrbiter on Apr 9, 2024 18:05:17 GMT
"With all due professional regards."
<splutter!>
|
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Apr 9, 2024 22:15:53 GMT
I have already written the letter. Dear Dr Mann I am sending you some databases that you may find interesting. Or not ... as they don't seem to support your primary thesis that human CO2 emissions are the primary culprit for recent global warming. However, as a "good" scientist, I have at least some faith that you will give them a dispassionate evaluation, as all good scientists will. I look forward to your response.
With all due professional regards. Missouriboy.
I suggest you sign it Dr. Missouriboy or he won't read it. .... and begin with the words "Please forgive this intrusion ...." |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Apr 18, 2024 1:06:41 GMT
NOAA is forecasting a "VERY LONG" SC25?
|
|
|
|
Post by nonentropic on Apr 18, 2024 1:15:39 GMT
that is not even possible is it?
|
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Apr 18, 2024 4:37:36 GMT
that is not even possible is it? 25 started 2020, on average cycles are 11 years, we're only around 1/3 in now. Their forecast however seems to show less of a peak and more of a plateau however? |
|
|
|
Post by tyrbiter on Apr 18, 2024 16:52:45 GMT
NOAA is forecasting a "VERY LONG" SC25?
Is there any indication what this prediction is based on and who (as in actual name(s)) has made it?
Has it just been knitted out of fog or is there science hiding in plain sight?
|
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Apr 18, 2024 18:08:26 GMT
that is not even possible is it? Don't know. Mavbe they are training up some new recruits. Gonna see if I can find a source to get the source. |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Apr 18, 2024 18:21:16 GMT
NOAA is forecasting a "VERY LONG" SC25?
Is there any indication what this prediction is based on and who (as in actual name(s)) has made it?
Has it just been knitted out of fog or is there science hiding in plain sight?
Longest cycle I can find is SC4 starting in 1796 at 14 years. THIS forecast would be ~20 years? That could be 2 solar cycles. |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Apr 18, 2024 19:10:58 GMT
that is not even possible is it? 25 started 2020, on average cycles are 11 years, we're only around 1/3 in now. Their forecast however seems to show less of a peak and more of a plateau however? OK. I downloaded the numbers and plotted them on the tail of SC25 sunspots. Length ranges from about 13 to 20 years. Mid-range about 16 years. I.E. longer than any cycle we have recorded. Break out the triple-quilted long Johns.  Low UV for a decade or more WILL NOT be good for ocean heat content.  |
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Apr 19, 2024 4:35:42 GMT
New highest daily SSN at 247.
Beats lasts July's 228.
|
|
|
|
Post by tyrbiter on Apr 19, 2024 9:32:23 GMT
New highest daily SSN at 247. Beats lasts July's 228. The sun raising the finger to NOAA. |
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Apr 22, 2024 4:26:14 GMT
Wow, sun just hit a 283, from 40 just last week, massive spike!  |
|
Low UV for a decade or more WILL NOT be good for ocean heat content.