|
Post by glennkoks on May 21, 2024 20:40:42 GMT
The guy in the video is either misinformed or just a paid Chinese shill. China has become the global leader in steel, solar and EV production because they subsidize these industries making it impossible for other nations to compete. If this guy thinks Biden's new tariffs are tough wait until Trump is re-elected. If Covid taught us anything it is that being overly dependent on a totalitarian regime for essential supply chain needs like steel, aluminum and antibiotics is just plain stupid. Globalization has dangerous flaws. China can suck it! American's don't need their solar panels or their EV's. We have plentiful clean burning natural gas and are now the worlds biggest producer of crude to power our internal combustion engines. As for their aluminum and steel? They can keep it and build more ghost cities. I would rather pay more and revamp our production or do business with friendly democracies like Mexico, Canada, Norway and Iceland. The quicker the world decouples from the totalitarian regime in Beijing the better off we will be... The following link is from the American Iron and Steel Institute on Chinese steel production. www.steel.org/2024/01/steel-market-update-column-us-trade-laws-must-be-upgraded-to-address-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative/#:~:text=For%20many%20years%2C%20Chinese%20government,metric%20tons%20globally%20last%20year.
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Jun 8, 2024 10:11:24 GMT
Life in China
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Jun 10, 2024 11:59:25 GMT
Capital flight from China is a huge problem and perhaps the best barometer on the health of the Chinese Economy. Foreign investment typically flows into promising nations in search of a good return on investment. However the opposite is also true. Plentiful cheap investment cash is simply no longer available.
|
|
|
CHINA
Jul 11, 2024 0:43:10 GMT
code likes this
Post by ratty on Jul 11, 2024 0:43:10 GMT
This came to me by email .... FWIW:
|
|
|
Post by code on Jul 11, 2024 17:00:50 GMT
July 9, 2024 China’s Nautical Strategyby Brent Ramsey With vast numbers and capabilities that seemingly outpace the U.S., the Chinese are in a prime position.patriotpost.us/articles/108297-chinas-nautical-strategy-2024-07-09Brent Ramsey Bio Captain Brent Ramsey (U.S. Navy, Ret.) served 30 years in the Navy and 23 years in Navy Civil Service. His assignments included Commanding Officer, Cargo Handling Battalion TWELVE, Executive Director, Construction Battalion Center, Gulfport, and Mississippi Navy Emergency Preparedness Liaison Officer. He served as Senior Advisor, Center for International Maritime Security, and was Member and Secretary of the non-partisan Military Advisory Group for Congressman Mark Meadows (NC-11) for four years. He currently serves in the same capacity for Congressman Chuck Edwards. He is a Vice President with Calvert Group and on the Board of Advisors for STARRS and the Center for Military Readiness. CAPT Ramsey studied at Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, and is a graduate of the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Executive Management Program, the Reserve Components National Security Course, and the FEMA Emergency Preparedness Management Officers Course. He has written extensively on national defense matters since 2017.
|
|
|
CHINA
Jul 13, 2024 6:19:59 GMT
Post by missouriboy on Jul 13, 2024 6:19:59 GMT
|
|
|
CHINA
Jul 13, 2024 7:04:55 GMT
Post by ratty on Jul 13, 2024 7:04:55 GMT
Don't think we're not headed the same way.
|
|
|
Post by phydeaux2363 on Jul 13, 2024 15:27:20 GMT
Project 2025 calls for social credit scoring and the public beheading of anyone whose score drops below a certain level. This doesn't apply to women, who need no social credit score since they will be confined to their houses making white bonnets and practicing spreading their legs. Johnnie Chinaman has nothing that the Heritage Foundation hasn't already thought of!!
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Jul 13, 2024 16:06:09 GMT
As always, refer to the writ.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Aug 17, 2024 13:01:05 GMT
|
|
|
CHINA
Aug 17, 2024 22:54:52 GMT
Post by ratty on Aug 17, 2024 22:54:52 GMT
Surplus housing for > two billion people? Could that be correct?
|
|
|
CHINA
Aug 18, 2024 12:30:00 GMT
Post by gridley on Aug 18, 2024 12:30:00 GMT
Surplus housing for > two billion people? Could that be correct? I have no idea whether it is, but I see no reason why it couldn't be.
"Location, location, location." People want to live in good neighborhoods, often with good school districts, and not too far from jobs and shopping.
Build a house in a place with all of those things, and it can be sold for a high price.
Build the *exact same house* next to a run-down trailer park, or in the middle of nowhere, and how much can you sell it for? Can you sell it at all?
Every time I've gone looking to buy a house, I've found ones that have been on the market for over a year. EVERY time, EVERY place I looked. Usually, there was a clear reason why they weren't of interest to me (and to most people). But they're ALWAYS there.
Pick a county, go to a house-hunting site, and look at the number of listed properties. True, some are occupied. Plenty aren't.
And that's here. I've been told (haven't seen myself) that in China there are entire empty cities. I've likewise seen reports of entire empty apartment buildings in some cities here in the US.
I don't know if they're counting it, but what about under-utilized housing? I grew up in a four-bedroom house. Over the roughly two decades that was my permanent residence the only times all four bedrooms were occupied was when we had guests. I lived for a while in a three-bedroom apartment - we didn't even have a BED in one of the bedrooms.
What about people who own multiple houses? Clearly at least one of them is surplus. Do those count?
|
|
|
CHINA
Aug 19, 2024 7:24:11 GMT
Post by nonentropic on Aug 19, 2024 7:24:11 GMT
It can't be a surplus for 2B people that implies that more than 50% of the housing stock permanently empty.
If a dwelling has a total construction cost of say US$250k its much more here but China is competitive, then the invest cash is one billion houses (10exp9) times houses at $250k (2.5x10exp5) so 2.5x10exp14 2500 trillion dollars, to much.
|
|
|
CHINA
Aug 19, 2024 10:44:00 GMT
Post by gridley on Aug 19, 2024 10:44:00 GMT
It can't be a surplus for 2B people that implies that more than 50% of the housing stock permanently empty. If a dwelling has a total construction cost of say US$250k its much more here but China is competitive, then the invest cash is one billion houses (10exp9) times houses at $250k (2.5x10exp5) so 2.5x10exp14 2500 trillion dollars, to much. Most houses outside of high-demand areas *sell* for less than $250k. Don't forget the land under them. The *construction cost* is based on the materials and labor which is NOT highly dependent on the location.
Also, why assume the "surplus" is permanently empty? As noted, houses can sit vacant for LONG periods... but that doesn't mean they stay that way forever.
|
|
|
CHINA
Aug 20, 2024 9:07:32 GMT
Post by flearider on Aug 20, 2024 9:07:32 GMT
It can't be a surplus for 2B people that implies that more than 50% of the housing stock permanently empty. If a dwelling has a total construction cost of say US$250k its much more here but China is competitive, then the invest cash is one billion houses (10exp9) times houses at $250k (2.5x10exp5) so 2.5x10exp14 2500 trillion dollars, to much. have a look on you tube .. there blowing up part finished tower estates ..2b is a little to much ..but not by a lot ..
|
|