|
Post by nonentropic on Jun 20, 2022 21:58:55 GMT
From my trip muzzles optional and rare
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 21, 2022 4:59:36 GMT
From my trip muzzles optional and rare More or less the same here in Portugal. Government says masks still required on public transport and most seem to conform out of habit. Drivers don't push it and the masks vanish the instant passengers exit the doors. The Portuguese seem generally well-behaved, friendly people. Generally easy-going nature and helpful.
Between countries (by air), the rapid antigen tests are still required (mostly). Efficient airport setups provide test results in 10-15 minutes at 20 euros a shot. Two slightly bored looking Portuguese airport officials took a quick look at our papers as we entered. Covid seems pretty much dead, but the testing business seems quite resistant to change. Number of passengers crossing border times 20 euros each yields a lot of money. Expect it to remain. One more tax for a tax-happy society. Not sure about testing requirements at land border crossings
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Jun 21, 2022 22:15:33 GMT
|
|
Astromet
Level 3 Rank
Meanwhile, here in the real world...
Posts: 169
|
Post by Astromet on Jun 28, 2022 14:47:03 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Jun 28, 2022 15:20:45 GMT
I think that deserves another "Really?"
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 28, 2022 17:07:14 GMT
I think that deserves another "Really?" Heat begets cold ... just as morons beget Ph.Ds ... or just a desperate effort to ignore the obvious? They can only ignore the data for so long. Their ship is sinking and they must avoid the seemingly obvious climate relation to ENSO and ENSO's relation to Solar cycles. The two following charts show monthly ENSO SSTA deviations from the 1981-2010 monthly-specific means for regions 1+2, 3, 3.4 and 4 calculated for the first 2+ years of each Solar Cycle (SCs 19 to 25). The "climate cake" for the next decade is being baked even as we speak. If ENSO Region 1+2 (top chart right) represents inflows from the Eastern South Pacific, you can see cold setting in ... of a magnitude currently at Solar Cycle 20 levels. Think the 1970s at least. It is declining quickly. The Great Climate Shift of 1976 stands out in the central and western regions. The high peak of Solar Cycle 23 is due to El Nino warmth flowing all the way to the South American coast. The decline in ENSO Region 4 has been slower than the eastern regions, but will likely continue to bleed down. Declines in ENSO regions 1+2 and 3 are very steep. Region 3.4 is a composite of parts of Regions 3 and 4. Triple Dip? Maybe more. Tally ho.
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Jun 28, 2022 18:42:49 GMT
I think that deserves another "Really?" Heat begets cold ... just as morons beget Ph.Ds ... or just a desperate effort to ignore the obvious? They can only ignore the data for so long. Their ship is sinking and they must avoid the seemingly obvious climate relation to ENSO and ENSO's relation to Solar cycles. The two following charts show monthly ENSO SSTA deviations from the 1981-2010 monthly-specific means for regions 1+2, 3, 3.4 and 4 calculated for the first 2+ years of each Solar Cycle (SCs 19 to 25). The "climate cake" for the next decade is being baked even as we speak. If ENSO Region 1+2 (top chart right) represents inflows from the Eastern South Pacific, you can see cold setting in ... of a magnitude currently at Solar Cycle 20 levels. Think the 1970s at least. It is declining quickly. The Great Climate Shift of 1976 stands out in the central and western regions. The high peak of Solar Cycle 23 is due to El Nino warmth flowing all the way to the South American coast. The decline in ENSO Region 4 has been slower than the eastern regions, but will likely continue to bleed down. Declines in ENSO regions 1+2 and 3 are very steep. Region 3.4 is a composite of parts of Regions 3 and 4. Triple Dip? Maybe more. Tally ho.
Great stuff! PS: The cheque is in the mail.
|
|
|
Post by duwayne on Jun 28, 2022 19:28:44 GMT
I think that deserves another "Really?" Heat begets cold ... just as morons beget Ph.Ds ... or just a desperate effort to ignore the obvious? They can only ignore the data for so long. Their ship is sinking and they must avoid the seemingly obvious climate relation to ENSO and ENSO's relation to Solar cycles. The two following charts show monthly ENSO SSTA deviations from the 1981-2010 monthly-specific means for regions 1+2, 3, 3.4 and 4 calculated for the first 2+ years of each Solar Cycle (SCs 19 to 25). The "climate cake" for the next decade is being baked even as we speak. If ENSO Region 1+2 (top chart right) represents inflows from the Eastern South Pacific, you can see cold setting in ... of a magnitude currently at Solar Cycle 20 levels. Think the 1970s at least. It is declining quickly. The Great Climate Shift of 1976 stands out in the central and western regions. The high peak of Solar Cycle 23 is due to El Nino warmth flowing all the way to the South American coast. The decline in ENSO Region 4 has been slower than the eastern regions, but will likely continue to bleed down. Declines in ENSO regions 1+2 and 3 are very steep. Region 3.4 is a composite of parts of Regions 3 and 4. Triple Dip? Maybe more. Tally ho.
Is this showing one cycle of the quasi- 60 year cycle?
|
|
|
Post by nonentropic on Jun 28, 2022 22:03:01 GMT
I need more info what does the tag on the graphs point to just just more detail. This is important because it shows a lot.
I kind of understand it but it needs an explanation for me.
|
|
|
Post by nonentropic on Jun 28, 2022 22:10:32 GMT
you could do a yearly average rather than a monthly it would show more clearly the trend.
also the actual year on the x axis rather than the SC but showing which SC.
This is ground breaking and very compelling.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 28, 2022 23:33:03 GMT
Heat begets cold ... just as morons beget Ph.Ds ... or just a desperate effort to ignore the obvious? They can only ignore the data for so long. Their ship is sinking and they must avoid the seemingly obvious climate relation to ENSO and ENSO's relation to Solar cycles. The two following charts show monthly ENSO SSTA deviations from the 1981-2010 monthly-specific means for regions 1+2, 3, 3.4 and 4 calculated for the first 2+ years of each Solar Cycle (SCs 19 to 25). The "climate cake" for the next decade is being baked even as we speak. If ENSO Region 1+2 (top chart right) represents inflows from the Eastern South Pacific, you can see cold setting in ... of a magnitude currently at Solar Cycle 20 levels. Think the 1970s at least. It is declining quickly. The Great Climate Shift of 1976 stands out in the central and western regions. The high peak of Solar Cycle 23 is due to El Nino warmth flowing all the way to the South American coast. The decline in ENSO Region 4 has been slower than the eastern regions, but will likely continue to bleed down. Declines in ENSO regions 1+2 and 3 are very steep. Region 3.4 is a composite of parts of Regions 3 and 4. Triple Dip? Maybe more. Tally ho.
Is this showing one cycle of the quasi- 60 year cycle? Certainly possible. It represents ENSO Region values during the "ramp-up" phase (the first 36 months) of seven solar cycles starting in January of the solar cycle start year (SC25 is 7 months short so far). This amounts to nearly 69 years (1954-2022). Unfortunately, we a sample of one full cycle.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 28, 2022 23:38:35 GMT
you could do a yearly average rather than a monthly it would show more clearly the trend. also the actual year on the x axis rather than the SC but showing which SC. This is ground breaking and very compelling. All good suggestions. It is a bit "busy". I'll clean it up and re-post.
|
|
|
Post by nonentropic on Jun 28, 2022 23:39:24 GMT
MB is there any usable data before this imagine if this could be worked back to say 1920 or so. That is with credence.
Is the water temperature data "homogenized' or worked?
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 29, 2022 19:14:37 GMT
MB is there any usable data before this imagine if this could be worked back to say 1920 or so. That is with credence. Is the water temperature data "homogenized' or worked? Back on the old site, Icefisher used to talk about the scarcity and unreliability of Pacific data prior to WWII. I have not found anything to challenge that assessment. The 1950 start date for the ENSO regions is pretty much it for direct SST measurements. The published data are (I assume) averages for the whole region. There is always the SOI, which is correlated with ENSO, but is not a direct measure of SSTs. As shown below, it might be useable for rough estimates of mid-Pacific SSTs. Others have probably tried it. www.weather.gov/jetstream/enso
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Jun 29, 2022 22:19:28 GMT
you could do a yearly average rather than a monthly it would show more clearly the trend. also the actual year on the x axis rather than the SC but showing which SC. This is ground breaking and very compelling. I'll speak with the board about additional funding.
|
|