|
|
Post by ratty on May 20, 2023 23:14:41 GMT
An hour and a half! My bladder won't last that long ..... need a precis, please.  |
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Jun 5, 2023 12:36:56 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by gridley on Jun 15, 2023 23:11:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Jun 16, 2023 0:38:31 GMT
I had to check that it wasn't from the Bee proper.  |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 16, 2023 2:10:50 GMT
I see lawyers in Amazon's future. My house isn't very smart ... and i'm really happy it's not. |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 19, 2023 23:42:24 GMT
Ireland now stands on the precipice of freedom. The embrace of such laws by the Irish is crushingly ironic. Frank Ryan, who fought against the treaty, spoke for many radicals in declaring “as long as we have fists and boots, there will be no free speech for traitors.” Those anti-Treaty forces rejected the views of free speech that long defined Western nations. Now, Ireland is declaring “no free speech for haters” and assumes the authority to define who are haters and who are not.
|
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 22, 2023 0:26:32 GMT
Durham is slow ... but he seems to be thourgh.
|
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Jun 26, 2023 1:25:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by nonentropic on Jun 26, 2023 2:17:13 GMT
Google would be broke if the courts will use an evidenced based evaluation of disinformation.
2% of a tenth of a trillion could make Australia very wealthy.
|
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 26, 2023 2:31:54 GMT
All science, by definition, is potentially unintentionally false. What once was considered true, is often falsified. So science must stop? If a politically accepted science result is falsified, will the ACMA be fined for allowing the falsified results to be published in the past?
|
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Jun 26, 2023 7:21:23 GMT
All science, by definition, is potentially unintentionally false. What once was considered true, is often falsified. So science must stop? If a politically accepted science result is falsified, will the ACMA be fined for allowing the falsified results to be published in the past?
A smart person once said "Science advances through disagreement" OWTTE. Feynman? |
|
|
|
Post by nonentropic on Jun 26, 2023 8:07:43 GMT
but in reality it advances one funeral at a time.
|
|
|
|
Post by douglavers on Jun 26, 2023 12:20:25 GMT
The Misinformation Bill is incredibly dangerous.
It is a wobbly step away from censorship.
Besides, over the last few years viewpoints that various governments considered "disinformation" have proven correct.
Global Warming sceptics might be caught up in this.
|
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 26, 2023 13:30:14 GMT
The Misinformation Bill is incredibly dangerous. It is a wobbly step away from censorship. Besides, over the last few years viewpoints that various governments considered "disinformation" have proven correct. Global Warming sceptics might be caught up in this. We might be in the top three or four against the wall. After all, we are dangerous. It is very un-American (and stupid) to require conformity to a viewpoint. Harkens back to the McCarthy era ,,, even though his warnings of Communists in the government was at least partially true. Total truth in science rarely exists for long. Those screaming the loudest are usually charlatans and demigogues, Exactly the people that should not be put in charge of policy. |
|
|
|
Post by gridley on Jun 27, 2023 11:52:20 GMT
The Misinformation Bill is incredibly dangerous. It is a wobbly step away from censorship. Besides, over the last few years viewpoints that various governments considered "disinformation" have proven correct. Global Warming sceptics might be caught up in this. It isn't a wobbly step away from censorship. It IS censorship. |
|
