|
|
Post by acidohm on Jul 4, 2021 10:58:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Jul 4, 2021 12:01:52 GMT
You beat me to it Acid! Great article with terrific historical information. Highly recommend for all on this forum. Keep in mind the complexity of this and how humans are just scratching the surface of what is happening. These measurements are points in time and space! They give insight into the physics but are obviously not global and represent the beginning of actual data! I wish I was involved in this team, very cool science. |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jul 4, 2021 13:03:15 GMT
You beat me to it Acid! Great article with terrific historical information. Highly recommend for all on this forum. Keep in mind the complexity of this and how humans are just scratching the surface of what is happening. These measurements are points in time and space! They give insight into the physics but are obviously not global and represent the beginning of actual data! I wish I was involved in this team, very cool science. To a day when new degrees will be conferred under a title similar to "Planetary Electrician". Merlin would astounded. But the ancient Celts always knew that planetary elements had an energy that played across a larger continuum. |
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Dec 2, 2021 19:24:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 4, 2022 20:40:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Feb 1, 2022 23:50:44 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by code on Jul 4, 2022 16:01:18 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by flearider on Jul 4, 2022 17:56:32 GMT
yeah im thinking there wrong .. cycles are just that give or take ... so where due one .. simples even if we don't agree it will be a site worth seeing .. god bless us all safe travels ....  |
|
|
|
Post by Jane in the centre of England on Jun 11, 2023 8:31:49 GMT
I would very much like to hear what you make of this: . I can nitpick some details in what he presents, but would like to know if you can go along with the main argument. What has he missed? Is his reasoning flawed, and if so how?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jane in the centre of England on Jun 11, 2023 13:42:53 GMT
Further thoughts: this man's theory seems to hinge on the 40 degree hypothesis and whether he has correctly located the 40 degree point. The 40 degree hypothesis has been dismissed as pseudoscience. I would be very interested if someone can explain to me why it is wrong.
Reasons to stay open-minded ... yesterday's pseudoscience can become tomorrow's orthodoxy. Alfred Wegener's continental drift theory was dismissed for half a century until it became incorporated as plate tectonics. Crazy ideas can turn out to have validity - or be dismissed with reasoning and evidence and then disappear.
|
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Jun 11, 2023 14:56:34 GMT
Further thoughts: this man's theory seems to hinge on the 40 degree hypothesis and whether he has correctly located the 40 degree point. The 40 degree hypothesis has been dismissed as pseudoscience. I would be very interested if someone can explain to me why it is wrong.
Reasons to stay open-minded ... yesterday's pseudoscience can become tomorrow's orthodoxy. Alfred Wegener's continental drift theory was dismissed for half a century until it became incorporated as plate tectonics. Crazy ideas can turn out to have validity - or be dismissed with reasoning and evidence and then disappear.
Hapgood's ideas were supported by Einstein I believe, at the time. From my understanding, as the mantle has its own dynamics which in some locations result in surface bound plumes resulting in volcanos such as the Hawaiian islands. The hawaiian Islands demonstrate tectonic movement really well, the crust moves over a plume which leaves volcanos of increasing age ahead of the current locations. Dating these volcanoes tells you how long the crust has been moving over that specific spot. Also, where are the dormant volcanos of similar creation but now moved from a causing plume. None of this information was available to Hapgood as he pondered his theories, he was clearly a brilliant 'out of the box' thinker. I first heard of hapgood in Fingerprints of the God's nearly 25 years ago, I am very much a fan of Graham Hancock. Just don't tell me it was aliens. |
|
|
|
Post by Jane in the centre of England on Jun 11, 2023 16:23:06 GMT
Acidohm, thank you. I didn't know the idea originated with Charles Hapgood. I've never read anything by him, so there's some catching up to do here
|
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Jun 11, 2023 16:39:37 GMT
Acidohm, thank you. I didn't know the idea originated with Charles Hapgood. I've never read anything by him, so there's some catching up to do here I hope that's correct, I googled 40 degree hypothesis and hapgood is what mostly came back. |
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Jun 11, 2023 17:20:17 GMT
The simple demonstration with the compass and the extremely near and strong magnetic field is absent the complexity of our planet. One factor that comes to mind is eddy currents within the earth that will impede and dampen any fast change in field. Clearly the magnetic poles wander and probably always have. The poles have flipped repeatedly and perhaps remained at zero for sometime. Some argue it can happen fast occasionally but fast is a relative term. I’m not worried about this. igppweb.ucsd.edu/~parker/SIO229/geomag64-71.pdf |
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Jun 11, 2023 19:51:21 GMT
Acidohm, thank you. I didn't know the idea originated with Charles Hapgood. I've never read anything by him, so there's some catching up to do here OK, I've got some time to watch the vid.... Firstly, the 17th is my birthday and I have plans so I hope nothing untoward on a planetary scale happens! Clearly the 40 degree aspect and Hapgood don't correlate directly? But there is I guess some overlap. This guys compass demonstration is apparently very replicatable so holds as an experimental hypothesis. I'm not sure how to verify the wandering magbetic north Pole information without searching however in the background I've been aware that something like this is happening. He certainly appears to have been fastidious in collecting data for over 2 years and setting verifiable projections. |
|
