|
|
Post by Sigurdur on Jan 31, 2024 7:34:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Sigurdur on Jan 31, 2024 17:22:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 31, 2024 18:20:42 GMT
Relative? Note the beady little eyes.  |
|
|
|
Post by Sigurdur on Feb 8, 2024 17:59:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Feb 8, 2024 23:46:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Feb 9, 2024 1:11:22 GMT
I wonder why DeSmogBlog has compiled this list? Are they Agenda 2030 financed by the U.N.? Climate Disinformation DatabaseCheck if your name is on the list. |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Feb 9, 2024 1:57:16 GMT
I wonder why DeSmogBlog has compiled this list? Are they Agenda 2030 financed by the U.N.? Climate Disinformation DatabaseCheck if your name is on the list. David Dilley's write-up was civil enough. Are they going to issue badges to the witch hunters? |
|
|
|
Post by Sigurdur on Feb 9, 2024 15:44:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Feb 10, 2024 0:46:18 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Sigurdur on Feb 10, 2024 17:57:38 GMT
www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-45112-6Despite increased Atlantic hurricane risk, projected trends in hurricane frequency in the warming climate are still highly uncertain, mainly due to short instrumental record that limits our understanding of hurricane activity and its relationship to climate. Here we extend the record to the last millennium using two independent estimates: a reconstruction from sedimentary paleohurricane
|
|
|
|
Post by Sigurdur on Feb 13, 2024 15:32:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Feb 14, 2024 1:21:57 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Aug 7, 2024 19:40:51 GMT
Here's something interesting that I don't think we've discussed: judithcurry.com/2024/08/04/role-of-humans-in-the-global-water-cycle-and-impacts-on-climate-change/"Conclusions and Recommendations: Anthropogenic water emissions are large enough to result in a ~5 to 7% incremental increase (4 to 5 Tt/yr) in land-to-atmosphere water flux and a similar increase in water vapor in the atmosphere over land areas impacted by human water uses such as irrigation, evaporative cooling and evaporation from water reservoirs. These water emissions are about 1000× the net increase in carbon mass emitted to the atmosphere and contribute significant amounts of latent energy to the atmosphere in cold northern areas, which GHG emissions do not. We recommend that such direct anthropogenic emissions of water vapor should be coherently incorporated into the contemporary climate models before forcing extreme actions related to the carbon balance alone." |
|
|
|
Post by Sigurdur on Aug 11, 2024 2:14:18 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by finewino on Aug 12, 2024 21:29:58 GMT
Greetings, all. I was not very active on the old board and this will be my first post here. In semi-retirement I’ve had time for other pursuits. My colleague, Markus Ott and I have been busy for the last 18 months or so debunking the “Greenhouse Effect” I know that sounds far fetched, but for those who are interested I invite you to review our work which is quite compelling unless you have been captured by the GHE religion. You can download our essay at: tomn.substack.com/api/v1/file/f08770ad-92c4-4884-890b-f969794b1a26.pdfThe essay is the most detailed. There is also a video version on Tom Nelson’s channel at: While the rest of the world has been arguing about “how much” warming is caused by CO2, we have been single-minded about showing that the “GHE” is impossible in the Earth’s atmosphere. There will be a new video released on Tom Nelson’s YouTube channel this week expanding on the details from a thermodynamic perspective, and another one in process looking from the quantum perspective. To fully appreciate what we present, one needs to suspend one’s belief in the “Greenhouse effect” model. One cannot refute the GHE within the context of the GHE. Needless to say there is great resistance to this from both sides of the issue, for many reasons. I hope that you will give it a look. |
|
