|
Post by missouriboy on Oct 9, 2024 22:20:20 GMT
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Oct 10, 2024 1:30:36 GMT
My gut hunch is Florida dodged a bullet. It weakened substantially before landfall and was further south in a less populated area. Yes it will be catastrophic, but not biblical. Insurance companies are having a bad year. Beryl, Helene and now Milton were expensive in a world where everything costs more.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Oct 10, 2024 9:10:40 GMT
My gut hunch is Florida dodged a bullet. It weakened substantially before landfall and was further south in a less populated area. Yes it will be catastrophic, but not biblical. Insurance companies are having a bad year. Beryl, Helene and now Milton were expensive in a world where everything costs more. This came to mind. but all things are relative. A similar set of two storm-flood events with similar placement and timing come to mind from several years ago. Can't remember the details. Somebody should explore that Madden Julian oscillation index connection that Joe brought up. At the beginning of its deep dive to "Beyond SC25" our sun is unloading. Timing and location are everything.
BEYOND SC25 can become a new theme. The residents of Spaceship Earth are set to go places that their ancestors had not seen in 3000
Years? The "Solar Reset" envisioned by Zharkova could have similar effects as those believed to have occurred in the Bronze Age.
The Bronze Age Collapse (also known as Late Bronze Age Collapse) is a modern-day term referring to the decline and fall of major Mediterranean civilizations during the 13th-12th centuries BCE. The precise cause of the Bronze Age Collapse has been debated by scholars for over a century as well as the date it probably began and when it ended but no consensus has been reached. What is clearly known is that, between c. 1250 - c. 1150 BCE, major cities were destroyed, whole civilizations fell, diplomatic and trade relations were severed, writing systems vanished, and there was widespread devastation and death on a scale never experienced before.
The primary causes advanced for the Bronze Age Collapse are:
Natural Catastrophes (earthquakes) Climate Change (which caused drought and famine) Internal Rebellions (class wars) Invasions (primarily by the Sea Peoples) Disruption of Trade Relations/Systems Collapse (political instability)
|
|
|
Post by duwayne on Oct 10, 2024 16:34:23 GMT
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Oct 10, 2024 20:45:50 GMT
"Facts" are NOT measurements any more in the "Woke" Bureaucracy. They are political statements it seems. Certain parts of the government cannot be trusted to give you "just the facts mamn. This Nation cannot live for long half slave and half free. And you know which ones I'm talking about Parts of the government need to be cleaned out down to the bone ... or below. Complete amputation. As Lincoln said ... " There are too many pigs for the teats". And they are malignant ... and must be removed or the nation will starve. Let them go their own way and see if they can feed themselves. Odds anyone? Incestrous filter feeders cannot survive on their their own once their host is gone.
|
|
|
Post by phydeaux2363 on Oct 10, 2024 20:55:34 GMT
In addition to Roy Spencer, Willis Eschenbach had a lot to say about this NHC reported wind compared to actual surface measurements. Tony Heller has touched on it as well. It certainly seems like a thing, and I think it will get more scrutiny in the future. That said, with all the climate doom hype that accompanies every hurricane these days, I doubt we will get an answer.
As for the dramatic decrease in Milton's intensity in the last 12 hours before landfall, Ryan Maue was the only commentator I follow who saw that coming. So whilst Milton was overhyped (and Helene's winds may have been as well) Mr. Glenn is correct about insurance costs. Premiums almost doubled for those of us immediately on the coast this year. I anticipate the same for next year. What I need to look at, though, is actual combined ratios for the major insurers who write on the coasts. More coastal development certainly makes losses higher when a storm hits. But the corollary to that is that the same development generates substantially more in premiums, which are based in large part on the value insured. Also, a significant portion of the damage from Helene will be from the floods in the Appalachians. I wonder if those folks bought flood insurance excess of the $250,000 mandated by FEMA. If not, the hit on private insurers from Helene might be mitigated. This needs more investigation. It is not unlike insurers to raise premiums after major losses, but when you look behind the curtain, the loss ratios, like the hurricanes themselves, are overhyped.
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Oct 10, 2024 21:58:10 GMT
In addition to Roy Spencer, Willis Eschenbach had a lot to say about this NHC reported wind compared to actual surface measurements. Tony Heller has touched on it as well. It certainly seems like a thing, and I think it will get more scrutiny in the future. That said, with all the climate doom hype that accompanies every hurricane these days, I doubt we will get an answer. As for the dramatic decrease in Milton's intensity in the last 12 hours before landfall, Ryan Maue was the only commentator I follow who saw that coming. So whilst Milton was overhyped (and Helene's winds may have been as well) Mr. Glenn is correct about insurance costs. Premiums almost doubled for those of us immediately on the coast this year. I anticipate the same for next year. What I need to look at, though, is actual combined ratios for the major insurers who write on the coasts. More coastal development certainly makes losses higher when a storm hits. But the corollary to that is that the same development generates substantially more in premiums, which are based in large part on the value insured. Also, a significant portion of the damage from Helene will be from the floods in the Appalachians. I wonder if those folks bought flood insurance excess of the $250,000 mandated by FEMA. If not, the hit on private insurers from Helene might be mitigated. This needs more investigation. It is not unlike insurers to raise premiums after major losses, but when you look behind the curtain, the loss ratios, like the hurricanes themselves, are overhyped. Death, taxes .... and insurance premiums?
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Oct 10, 2024 22:48:28 GMT
Sigurdur, turned me onto Eric Snodgrass on Youtube and ag-wx.com a couple of years ago. Eric was pointing out that multiple model runs were weakening Milton due to increased shear 24 hours prior to landfall and leaving an exposed SE eye wall. I don't think the models handled this weakening well just prior to landfall. In addition it came in south of Tampa in a much less populated area so damage was less.
I will give credit where credit is due. The models performed excellently with the track of most Hurricanes this year with the exception of Beryl. Hurricane forecasting has advanced exponentially over the last 30 years.
With that being said they are still piss poor at forecasting intensity fluctuations. None of the models predicted a cat 5 storm and none of them forecasted the dramatic weakening as it neared the coast.
|
|
|
Post by gridley on Oct 11, 2024 11:42:35 GMT
Let them go their own way and see if they can feed themselves. Odds anyone? Incestrous filter feeders cannot survive on their their own once their host is gone. Ah, but that's one reason for the illegal immigrants. Slave labor to work the fields.
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Oct 12, 2024 23:34:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by duwayne on Oct 13, 2024 14:19:37 GMT
In addition to Roy Spencer, Willis Eschenbach had a lot to say about this NHC reported wind compared to actual surface measurements. Tony Heller has touched on it as well. It certainly seems like a thing, and I think it will get more scrutiny in the future. That said, with all the climate doom hype that accompanies every hurricane these days, I doubt we will get an answer. As for the dramatic decrease in Milton's intensity in the last 12 hours before landfall, Ryan Maue was the only commentator I follow who saw that coming. So whilst Milton was overhyped (and Helene's winds may have been as well) Mr. Glenn is correct about insurance costs. Premiums almost doubled for those of us immediately on the coast this year. I anticipate the same for next year. What I need to look at, though, is actual combined ratios for the major insurers who write on the coasts. More coastal development certainly makes losses higher when a storm hits. But the corollary to that is that the same development generates substantially more in premiums, which are based in large part on the value insured. Also, a significant portion of the damage from Helene will be from the floods in the Appalachians. I wonder if those folks bought flood insurance excess of the $250,000 mandated by FEMA. If not, the hit on private insurers from Helene might be mitigated. This needs more investigation. It is not unlike insurers to raise premiums after major losses, but when you look behind the curtain, the loss ratios, like the hurricanes themselves, are overhyped. My brother's ranch house near Ocala Florida, 10 miles away from the Gulf Coast, is valued on Zillow at $1.3 million. The insurance is $48,500 per year.
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Oct 15, 2024 0:49:45 GMT
Video showing Florida governor Ron DeSantis discussing Milton and its predecessors...
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Oct 16, 2024 12:03:53 GMT
Don't forget to invite them to your cocktail party.
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Oct 23, 2024 11:35:44 GMT
|
|