|
|
Post by glennkoks on Sept 16, 2023 14:29:02 GMT
The reality is this is a Biden vs Trump rematch. Unless President Biden gets ill or drops out he will be the nominee for the blue team. Kennedy, DeSantis and Ramaswamy etc are just waisting time. We are a little over a year out and a lot can happen but I like Trumps odds...
|
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Sept 16, 2023 14:43:53 GMT
The reality is this is a Biden vs Trump rematch. Unless President Biden gets ill or drops out he will be the nominee for the blue team. Kennedy, DeSantis and Ramaswamy etc are just waisting time. We are a little over a year out and a lot can happen but I like Trumps odds... I do not believe Biden/Harris will be the Dem ticket. I expect an 11th hour swap to completely change all narratives and spellbind the media and Kardashian Class; but I admittedly know nothing. |
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Sept 16, 2023 14:53:50 GMT
The reality is this is a Biden vs Trump rematch. Unless President Biden gets ill or drops out he will be the nominee for the blue team. Kennedy, DeSantis and Ramaswamy etc are just waisting time. We are a little over a year out and a lot can happen but I like Trumps odds... I do not believe Biden/Harris will be the Dem ticket. I expect an 11th hour swap to completely change all narratives and spellbind the media and Kardashian Class; but I admittedly know nothing. I don't think that is a good strategy as people need time to get behind a candidate. I don't think an 11th hour swap would be a good strategy against Trump who has already locked up the nomination and is literally crushing the other candidates. |
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Sept 16, 2023 15:05:10 GMT
I do not believe Biden/Harris will be the Dem ticket. I expect an 11th hour swap to completely change all narratives and spellbind the media and Kardashian Class; but I admittedly know nothing. I don't think that is a good strategy as people need time to get behind a candidate. I don't think an 11th hour swap would be a good strategy against Trump who has already locked up the nomination and is literally crushing the other candidates. Since Biden is the “incumbent” and continues to claim he’s running, I consider December/January the 11th hour. Your point is well taken though. |
|
|
|
Post by gridley on Sept 18, 2023 11:36:27 GMT
I don't think that is a good strategy as people need time to get behind a candidate. I don't think an 11th hour swap would be a good strategy against Trump who has already locked up the nomination and is literally crushing the other candidates. Since Biden is the “incumbent” and continues to claim he’s running, I consider December/January the 11th hour. Your point is well taken though. Creepy Joe "won" in large part due to being almost completely unscrutinized. The Dems may feel this is a winning formula. If so a last-second swap for another candidate would let that candidate be heavily unscruitinized, especially if they come up with another manufactured "crisis" to draw media attention. I don't know how likely that is, but if Trump is the candidate he does a good job producing press for both sides. The Dem media (which is most of them) don't have to talk about their candidate at all if they have something about Trump to run with (and you can bet they will, even if they need the FBI's help to manufacture it). |
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Sept 18, 2023 12:51:45 GMT
Since Biden is the “incumbent” and continues to claim he’s running, I consider December/January the 11th hour. Your point is well taken though. Creepy Joe "won" in large part due to being almost completely unscrutinized. The Dems may feel this is a winning formula. If so a last-second swap for another candidate would let that candidate be heavily unscruitinized, especially if they come up with another manufactured "crisis" to draw media attention. I don't know how likely that is, but if Trump is the candidate he does a good job producing press for both sides. The Dem media (which is most of them) don't have to talk about their candidate at all if they have something about Trump to run with (and you can bet they will, even if they need the FBI's help to manufacture it). I do not believe that Joe actually "won", although I do not have much good to say about the American voters judgement. |
|
|
|
Post by phydeaux2363 on Sept 18, 2023 15:15:46 GMT
I've been riding the Michelle Obama horse since Joe got elected. Sometime around the first of the year Joe will back out citing health issues, Ms. Obama will "reluctantly" agree to step in for the "good of the country" and to defeat the existential threat of a second Trump presidency. The left will immediately fall in line, followed quickly by a majority of women, and then the independents. Trump will be left with hardcore MAGA, which might get him 40% of the popular vote, and 120 electoral votes tops. And then the fundamental transformation of America can continue.
|
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Sept 18, 2023 16:34:45 GMT
Do you really think that independents would back "Big Mike"? Does Mike have any actual credentials? barely passed the bar exam. I'm not saying I disagree, just hard to believe.
|
|
|
|
Post by phydeaux2363 on Sept 18, 2023 17:17:22 GMT
Do you really think that independents would back "Big Mike"? Does Mike have any actual credentials? barely passed the bar exam. I'm not saying I disagree, just hard to believe. If the GOP nominates Trump, I think a majority of independents will vote for Obama. Barack carried 52% of Independents in 2012. "Big Mike" as you say, would do at least that well and maybe better against an indicted, and possibly convicted, Trump |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Sept 19, 2023 12:13:18 GMT
Do you really think that independents would back "Big Mike"? Does Mike have any actual credentials? barely passed the bar exam. I'm not saying I disagree, just hard to believe. It seems that they backed "the Big Guy". And we all know what credentials he had. |
|
|
|
Post by gridley on Sept 20, 2023 11:35:19 GMT
Do you really think that independents would back "Big Mike"? Does Mike have any actual credentials? barely passed the bar exam. I'm not saying I disagree, just hard to believe. It seems that they backed "the Big Guy". And we all know what credentials he had. Bingo. Credentials, experience, talent... these are elitist privileges. Leftist candidates don't need them to get elected. AOC, Fetterman, Biden... please tell me what credentials ANY of them had? |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Sept 20, 2023 20:23:19 GMT
It seems that they backed "the Big Guy". And we all know what credentials he had. Bingo. Credentials, experience, talent... these are elitist privileges. Leftist candidates don't need them to get elected. AOC, Fetterman, Biden... please tell me what credentials ANY of them had? Big check books? Funded by OPM. |
|
|
|
Post by code on Sept 21, 2023 17:01:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Sigurdur on Sept 22, 2023 1:51:39 GMT
It seems that they backed "the Big Guy". And we all know what credentials he had. Bingo. Credentials, experience, talent... these are elitist privileges. Leftist candidates don't need them to get elected. AOC, Fetterman, Biden... please tell me what credentials ANY of them had? 10% Joe has credentials in graft. AOC has credentials in graft. Fetterman is a ready learner. |
|
|
|
Post by code on Sept 22, 2023 2:24:56 GMT
Bingo. Credentials, experience, talent... these are elitist privileges. Leftist candidates don't need them to get elected. AOC, Fetterman, Biden... please tell me what credentials ANY of them had? 10% Joe has credentials in graft. AOC has credentials in graft. Fetterman is a ready learner. Any bets if Fetterman shows up in a robe? |
|
