|
|
Post by missouriboy on Aug 1, 2021 23:47:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by code on Aug 2, 2021 17:03:58 GMT
Thanks for the link will look it over. |
|
|
|
Post by code on Aug 2, 2021 17:04:14 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by code on Aug 2, 2021 17:18:58 GMT
Flynn believes the election was secure
"2020 was “the most secure presidential election in U.S. history”
and he says in an
"Analysis of the fact"
So what happens if the results of the audit(s) show 2020 election fraud, and that Trump won?
to my knowledge there has been no evidence of election fraud.
|
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Aug 3, 2021 0:47:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by gridley on Aug 3, 2021 12:10:45 GMT
Flynn believes the election was secure
"2020 was “the most secure presidential election in U.S. history”
and he says in an
"Analysis of the fact"
So what happens if the results of the audit(s) show 2020 election fraud, and that Trump won?
to my knowledge there has been no evidence of election fraud.
I think you need to read the article again. Flynn does not say that - he quotes *someone else* as having said that, while talking about "thousands" of reports of fraud in the same paragraph.
If to your knowledge there has been no evidence of election fraud, I don't believe you've been looking anywhere but the MSM. There has been everything from witness reports by election officials and observers to *video* of ballots being pulled out of suitcases and from under tables to be counted. There was certainly some amount of fraud. Do a search (though perhaps not on Google) for "Arizona election audit" and prepare to be horrified.
As I've said before (and Flynn's piece would seem to indicate he is in agreement) what is unknown is the amount of fraud, and whether it was enough to swing the election.
|
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Aug 3, 2021 13:02:37 GMT
Flynn believes the election was secure
"2020 was “the most secure presidential election in U.S. history”
and he says in an
"Analysis of the fact"
So what happens if the results of the audit(s) show 2020 election fraud, and that Trump won?
to my knowledge there has been no evidence of election fraud.
I think you need to read the article again. Flynn does not say that - he quotes *someone else* as having said that, while talking about "thousands" of reports of fraud in the same paragraph.
If to your knowledge there has been no evidence of election fraud, I don't believe you've been looking anywhere but the MSM. There has been everything from witness reports by election officials and observers to *video* of ballots being pulled out of suitcases and from under tables to be counted. There was certainly some amount of fraud. Do a search (though perhaps not on Google) for "Arizona election audit" and prepare to be horrified.
As I've said before (and Flynn's piece would seem to indicate he is in agreement) what is unknown is the amount of fraud, and whether it was enough to swing the election.
If it's down to this, then it's already entirely unacceptable. Our partners are crooks. You end partnerships like that. |
|
|
|
Post by phydeaux2363 on Aug 3, 2021 15:38:16 GMT
I'm not sure if there was more fraud then usual in the traditional sense of the dead voting, for example. What troubles me is the potential for mischief from the COVID changes to registration and voting procedures, and especially allowing anyone to mail in their ballot over a substantial period of time. The mail in procedures at the very least slowed the vote counting, and where they caused after election day tallies to move from Trump wins to Biden victories in certain swing states, certainly created an air of impropriety. That "air" became enhanced when all the post election night swings went one way. Hell, why not allow internet or text voting in the future? Heavy reliance on mail in voting seems to me, at least, to create a richer environment for shenanigans than having people register and show up on election day to vote in person. Hell, make election day election week for all I care, but this old fogey likes the idea of voting in person.
|
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Aug 3, 2021 18:51:49 GMT
And here's a picture of an insane person....  |
|
|
|
Post by Sigurdur on Aug 3, 2021 19:58:57 GMT
Insane is an understatement
|
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Aug 4, 2021 0:48:13 GMT
Did you ever wonder how many Fascists live in YOUR neighborhood?
|
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Aug 4, 2021 1:19:32 GMT
Insane is an understatement Religious nutters abound. |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Aug 4, 2021 4:25:40 GMT
Insane is an understatement Religious nutters abound. His needle work isn't too good either.  |
|
|
|
Post by gridley on Aug 4, 2021 11:34:16 GMT
I think you need to read the article again. Flynn does not say that - he quotes *someone else* as having said that, while talking about "thousands" of reports of fraud in the same paragraph.
If to your knowledge there has been no evidence of election fraud, I don't believe you've been looking anywhere but the MSM. There has been everything from witness reports by election officials and observers to *video* of ballots being pulled out of suitcases and from under tables to be counted. There was certainly some amount of fraud. Do a search (though perhaps not on Google) for "Arizona election audit" and prepare to be horrified.
As I've said before (and Flynn's piece would seem to indicate he is in agreement) what is unknown is the amount of fraud, and whether it was enough to swing the election.
If it's down to this, then it's already entirely unacceptable. Our partners are crooks. You end partnerships like that. Oh, indeed, the lack of an investigation is completely unacceptable. As I believe I said either here or on the old board, I'm quite sure we've seen the last honest presidential election in the US (whether it was 2020, or 2016, or whatever). However much fraud there was, they got away with it. They're free to do it again, and more of it, next time. The Sock Puppet could run against a reincarnation of Lincoln and win.
|
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Aug 4, 2021 22:16:37 GMT
I like the look of this old movie, I'll get the rest of it.
|
|
