|
Post by missouriboy on Jul 8, 2022 1:46:06 GMT
Joe likes digital currency.
|
|
|
Post by Sigurdur on Jul 8, 2022 3:50:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Jul 8, 2022 6:02:27 GMT
Joe likes digital currency. Well, well. Joe is obviously a lot brighter than I had thought.
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Jul 8, 2022 12:07:44 GMT
Russell Brand again ..
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jul 8, 2022 15:07:11 GMT
I think there was a strike on the assembly line the day she was born. And it hasn't been helped by "the passage of time".
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Jul 9, 2022 12:42:27 GMT
Remember this photo? A real people's president, not going along with globalist bullshit. Abe not buckling either.
|
|
|
Post by duwayne on Jul 11, 2022 13:10:32 GMT
I've seen several videos recently of Biden's appearance at various venues where he gives the same speech. He says the economy was doing very well after he became president. Then Putin caused oil prices to skyrocket resulting in major inflation which has badly hurt the economy.
Today I looked at the oil price history. The world crude oil price jumped by 73% from January 2021 just after Biden became president until February 24, 2022 when Putin invaded Ukraine. Since the invasion, oil prices have increased 14%.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jul 11, 2022 15:48:15 GMT
We are seeing more and more of this on the new American airwaves. "Some" are openly speaking such in the public space. This is not good. You don't have to be a genius to look for comparisons in history, and evaluate the results.
Lincoln did not originate the main phrase of his House Divided speech. It came from the Bible. He did that a lot.
Matthew 12:25 - Knowing their thoughts, he said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and no city or house divided against itself will stand. Luke 11:17 - But he, knowing their thoughts, said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and a divided household falls.
Mark 3:24 - If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.
Maybe related. One could have predicted the result of the American Civil War by the geographic distribution of "Transports" in the following graph ... as it is (not shown) correlated with population and industrial output. The deck was heavily stacked against the South. Would large, Red American cities quickly find themselves in a similar situation? "Well-Regulated Militias" need supplies. Thus logistics are key. Another article might be titled ... Hand Guns will NOT win the next Civil War.
200 Years of the United States Stock Market in One Graph globalfinancialdata.com/200-years-of-the-united-states-stock-market-in-one-graph
|
|
|
Post by code on Jul 11, 2022 17:07:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Jul 11, 2022 19:51:10 GMT
I think Michele Obama will be the Democratic candidate at the “last minute” She will probably not participate in any debates. Newsom is a diversion.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jul 11, 2022 20:23:28 GMT
They still want a Communist (on average). They just want a competent Communist.
|
|
|
Post by Sigurdur on Jul 12, 2022 1:23:13 GMT
There is no such thing.
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Jul 12, 2022 2:00:37 GMT
We are seeing more and more of this on the new American airwaves. "Some" are openly speaking such in the public space. This is not good. You don't have to be a genius to look for comparisons in history, and evaluate the results.
Lincoln did not originate the main phrase of his House Divided speech. It came from the Bible. He did that a lot.
Matthew 12:25 - Knowing their thoughts, he said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and no city or house divided against itself will stand. Luke 11:17 - But he, knowing their thoughts, said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and a divided household falls.
Mark 3:24 - If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.
Maybe related. One could have predicted the result of the American Civil War by the geographic distribution of "Transports" in the following graph ... as it is (not shown) correlated with population and industrial output. The deck was heavily stacked against the South. Would large, Red American cities quickly find themselves in a similar situation? "Well-Regulated Militias" need supplies. Thus logistics are key. Another article might be titled ... Hand Guns will NOT win the next Civil War.
200 Years of the United States Stock Market in One Graph globalfinancialdata.com/200-years-of-the-united-states-stock-market-in-one-graph“[T]he blues face a real challenge. They will have those massively over-extended logistical lines. It’s nice to hold cities, but if you do not also hold all the rural territory between the cities, as well as the routes to the places where you are getting your food and fuel (and holding those is a big question in itself), then you have a real problem. The stuff that keeps cities alive has to pass through Indian country, and even assuming you could convince civilian truckers to make that passage, the blue states would still have to devote a massive proportion of their forces to defending those routes. Even a small-scale campaign against those supply lines could cause chaos in the cities. Imagine the madness as soft urban professionals, unused to privation and largely disarmed, find themselves both starving and subject to the will of the strong and merciless."
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jul 12, 2022 2:36:25 GMT
You know that ... and I know that ... but these people don't (can't) read history. Their Woke hidden Imam is coming to save them.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jul 12, 2022 2:55:08 GMT
We are seeing more and more of this on the new American airwaves. "Some" are openly speaking such in the public space. This is not good. You don't have to be a genius to look for comparisons in history, and evaluate the results.
Lincoln did not originate the main phrase of his House Divided speech. It came from the Bible. He did that a lot.
Matthew 12:25 - Knowing their thoughts, he said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and no city or house divided against itself will stand. Luke 11:17 - But he, knowing their thoughts, said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and a divided household falls.
Mark 3:24 - If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.
Maybe related. One could have predicted the result of the American Civil War by the geographic distribution of "Transports" in the following graph ... as it is (not shown) correlated with population and industrial output. The deck was heavily stacked against the South. Would large, Red American cities quickly find themselves in a similar situation? "Well-Regulated Militias" need supplies. Thus logistics are key. Another article might be titled ... Hand Guns will NOT win the next Civil War.
200 Years of the United States Stock Market in One Graph globalfinancialdata.com/200-years-of-the-united-states-stock-market-in-one-graph“[T]he blues face a real challenge. They will have those massively over-extended logistical lines. It’s nice to hold cities, but if you do not also hold all the rural territory between the cities, as well as the routes to the places where you are getting your food and fuel (and holding those is a big question in itself), then you have a real problem. The stuff that keeps cities alive has to pass through Indian country, and even assuming you could convince civilian truckers to make that passage, the blue states would still have to devote a massive proportion of their forces to defending those routes. Even a small-scale campaign against those supply lines could cause chaos in the cities. Imagine the madness as soft urban professionals, unused to privation and largely disarmed, find themselves both starving and subject to the will of the strong and merciless." Woke Blue urban jihadiis know how to loot defenseless urban stores. Their logistics are liberated Nikes. They cannot organize anything bigger than a few neighborhood bros and absolutely cannot build anything. The soft urban professionals are playing way out of their league. They would not survive. Note ... you are assuming that the quality-challenged urban mayors could actually attract, supply and keep any quantity or quality of Forces. I don't believe that a large proportion of the Army would lower themselves to those standards. As far as I can tell, most National Guard units are not large-uraban-centric.
|
|