|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Oct 26, 2021 10:04:14 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Oct 26, 2021 12:25:44 GMT
Here is as good a place as any for this worrying development from Victoria:
|
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Dec 13, 2021 14:05:58 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Dec 13, 2021 15:01:23 GMT
People need to stop feeling pessimistic about the future ... and start getting mad. "They" work for us. "We" DON'T work for them. Hope for America’s Future Fades Friday, October 08, 2021 Americans have lost hope in the nation’s future since last year and only a third now believe the country’s best days are ahead. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that only 33% of American Adults now say America’s best days are in the future. That’s a steep decline from last November, when 47% of Likely Voters believed the nation’s best days were still ahead. As recently as April 2019, an absolute majority (54%) of voters saw America’s best days in the future. (To see survey question wording, click here.) (Want a free daily e-mail update? If it’s in the news, it’s in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook. Americans are not stupid. They know that incentivizing non production and out of control deficit spending has consequences. The vast majority of Americans have to live within a budget and have had to climb out of a hole at some point in their lives. |
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Dec 14, 2021 4:12:56 GMT
People need to stop feeling pessimistic about the future ... and start getting mad. "They" work for us. "We" DON'T work for them. Hope for America’s Future Fades Friday, October 08, 2021 Americans have lost hope in the nation’s future since last year and only a third now believe the country’s best days are ahead. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that only 33% of American Adults now say America’s best days are in the future. That’s a steep decline from last November, when 47% of Likely Voters believed the nation’s best days were still ahead. As recently as April 2019, an absolute majority (54%) of voters saw America’s best days in the future. (To see survey question wording, click here.) (Want a free daily e-mail update? If it’s in the news, it’s in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook. Americans are not stupid. They know that incentivizing non production and out of control deficit spending has consequences. The vast majority of Americans have to live within a budget and have had to climb out of a hole at some point in their lives. Does that apply to the last two generations of Americans who went thru the education system? |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Dec 14, 2021 8:38:09 GMT
Americans are not stupid. They know that incentivizing non production and out of control deficit spending has consequences. The vast majority of Americans have to live within a budget and have had to climb out of a hole at some point in their lives. Does that apply to the last two generations of Americans who went thru the education system? They will find out that their so-called education didn't prepare them for a boy scout merit badge. They'll also find out, if they take to looting, that WE didn't forget how to take care of relatives of the Dalton gang. Perhaps your own Mr Andrews can read up on the word "gallows". Twould be a shame for him to miss that class in his education.  Seems he took too many notes from the landed class in the old country ... and needs a refresher. Undertaken with the best intent. |
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Dec 14, 2021 13:33:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Dec 14, 2021 16:07:06 GMT
When viewed on the scale of Human history, almost ALL fact is, in fact, opinion. Informed or otherwise. The highest praise bestowable upon a scientist is ... his/her opinion(s) held water longer than the other guys. High praise indeed. And yet, the mediocre continue to buff and polish their brass buttons ... and certain portions of the public fawn. |
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Dec 15, 2021 11:18:19 GMT
Facts change: I recall Stephen Fry saying on QI that answers given to some questions from early episodes would likely be incorrect now. |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Dec 15, 2021 18:06:47 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Jan 10, 2022 13:32:27 GMT
"The Associated Press – SEE HERE and Reuters – SEE HERE, quickly rush to the “fact check” typeset to stop people from recognizing what is most likely the cause of their own psychosis. In a world where things are no longer shocking, this is, well, a little shocking, in a weird and seemingly Orwellian kind of way. Yes Alice, the same “experts” and media who are credibly accused of creating/enabling the mass formation psychosis would like to assure us that no such reality exists. This is almost too funny." www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/you-know-global-elites-are-triggered-when-propaganda-institutions-collaborate-refute-mass |
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Jan 10, 2022 21:25:51 GMT
This is a good one right out of the White House: "Recently, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) retracted a highly influential paper on marine protected areas and fishing due to identification of significant errors that undercut the paper’s results as well as significant irregularities in the peer review process. What makes this particular retraction of unusual interest is that the irregularities in the PNAS peer review process involve Dr. Jane Lubchenco, the White House official who is currently overseeing President Biden’s Scientific Integrity Task Force." rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/fishy-science?r=ag38f&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email |
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Jan 15, 2022 18:23:22 GMT
Top Gear are prophets 😉
|
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 15, 2022 19:47:08 GMT
This is a good one right out of the White House: "Recently, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) retracted a highly influential paper on marine protected areas and fishing due to identification of significant errors that undercut the paper’s results as well as significant irregularities in the peer review process. What makes this particular retraction of unusual interest is that the irregularities in the PNAS peer review process involve Dr. Jane Lubchenco, the White House official who is currently overseeing President Biden’s Scientific Integrity Task Force." rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/fishy-science?r=ag38f&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=emailWhen the rot surfaces you know it goes all the way to the core. And this rot goes international. It needs to be excised with extreme prejudice. |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 15, 2022 21:16:49 GMT
My forecaster leaned so far left he fell over! Couldn't get him up with a forklift.  |
|
Seems he took too many notes from the landed class in the old country ... and needs a refresher. Undertaken with the best intent.
