|
|
Post by walnut on Jan 2, 2023 18:26:23 GMT
We now have two deceased infants on my wife's side, and her father suddenly cannot dress himself due to some new strange body pain. It sounds to a layman similar to Celine Dion "stiff person syndrome". All vaxxed in that country. But no covid-19 deaths to date, oh my god the unimaginable horror
|
|
|
|
Post by duwayne on Jan 2, 2023 19:06:45 GMT
Here's a Doctor discussing the recent Cleveland Clinic study (preprint) that is not getting much mainstream media attention. The study is here www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.fullThis quote from it certainly makes no sense when looking at Australian numbers. "The vaccines were amazingly effective in preventing COVID-19, saved a large number of lives, and changed the impact of the pandemic." The below quote, also from the study, does match what I have seen here. "The multivariable analyses also found that, the more recent the last prior COVID-19 episode was the lower the risk of COVID-19, and that the greater the number of vaccine doses previously received the higher the risk of COVID-19." My bold. Code, can the experts you are in contact with explain why the Cleveland Clinic Study (linked above) shows that when people who received the latest booster shot were tracked, they found that "the greater the number of vaccine doses previously received (prior to the recent booster), the higher the risk of COVID-19." This seems like a major finding based on a large (50,000 people) carefully controlled study. Does that mean we shouldn't get a booster?
|
|
|
|
Post by nonentropic on Jan 2, 2023 20:12:22 GMT
Interesting perspective indeed. Hard to believe how difficult it is to say what you did was maybe wrong or the evidence has shifted.
The Vaccine's are clearly problematic but in support of their use then, they reduced the death rate on the early variants not so anymore so the basis for the continuing use has gone.
|
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Jan 2, 2023 20:53:31 GMT
Interesting perspective indeed. Hard to believe how difficult it is to say what you did was maybe wrong or the evidence has shifted. The Vaccine's are clearly problematic but in support of their use then, they reduced the death rate on the early variants not so anymore so the basis for the continuing use has gone. Many, many thousands of people are dying as a direct result of the vaccines, so the question of their efficacy is worse than a moot point. A disastrous failure of biblical proportions. Proof? Stay tuned.. |
|
|
|
Post by nonentropic on Jan 2, 2023 21:24:35 GMT
I am not diminishing the vaccine impact clearly C19, its severity, has faded to the point that any action is likely more trouble than its worth.
These Chinese planes with 50% of the passenger infected or recently infected with C19 are in all likelihood about the same as the proportion with some recent cold or suchlike. The point being that they are not close to death being on a long haul plane.
|
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Jan 2, 2023 23:09:09 GMT
This poor woman's brain is glitching. Like the 32 bit program I am trying to run on 64 bit linux java this morning. That's more than a glitch: It's a total system failure. |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 3, 2023 7:17:51 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Jan 3, 2023 18:54:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Sigurdur on Jan 4, 2023 2:30:07 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by nemesis on Jan 4, 2023 15:38:54 GMT
sebastianrushworth.com/2022/04/14/what-defines-a-good-drug/(NNT = number needed to treat) 'The second drug, as many of you have probably also guessed, is a statin (examples include atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin). More than a quarter of adults over the age of 40 take a statin every day in western countries. So, what is the NNT for statins? Well, if you’ve already had a heart attack, i.e. you’ve already been established to be at high risk for heart attacks, then the NNT over five years of treatment is 40. In other words, 39 of 40 people taking a high dose statin for five years after a heart attack won’t experience any noticeable benefit. But even if they’re not the lucky one in 40 who gets to avoid a heart attack, they’ll still have to contend with the side effects.'
|
|
|
|
Post by code on Jan 4, 2023 17:13:13 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 6, 2023 1:45:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 7, 2023 17:33:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 8, 2023 16:37:16 GMT
True or no ... or partial. Faith in Government and "the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex" is at an all-time low.
|
|
|
|
Post by nonentropic on Jan 8, 2023 17:37:48 GMT
The IR therapy is very mainstream.
Hugely successful and has a long Canadian background, my brother in law uses it personally he is an ophthalmologist in his day job. The problem is that the health industry has no clear method to toll the punters.
The original machine he purchased was $18k you can now buy a perfectly satisfactory Chinese version for $1k or less, as such I have one and many others do also. The problem is the knowledge is suppressed in a sense. And yes it is fully safe there is no risk as its IR.
|
|
