|
Post by ratty on Jul 24, 2022 21:52:09 GMT
|
|
douglavers
Level 3 Rank
Posts: 172
Member is Online
|
Post by douglavers on Jul 25, 2022 2:59:49 GMT
If you want to talk about scientific fraud, nothing beats CAGW for cost and stupidity.
Spectroscopic saturation arguments should have immediately killed the debate.
Geological history declares that for most of the last 600 million years, CO2 concentrations were up to 10 ten times today's values. Ice ages came and went, and hot periods did not the planet cook.
As soon as anyone said "The science is settled", everyone should have gone rodent hunting [Not a dig at you Ratty!].
Sadly anyone who tried to argue was deplatformed or, in the case of a number of meteorologists in the US, lost their jobs. The rest decided that food and family were important.
We are now cooling quite rapidly, a large number of nations are facing existential fuel and food crises, so "Net Zero" is dead.
Sadly, the Oz government is still charging down the latter pathway. One suspects that in a year or two vast embarrassment will follow.
|
|
|
Post by Wim Goossen on Jul 25, 2022 7:39:28 GMT
I hope that a whole lot of politician get their `Nicolae Ceaușescu` moment, for their actions, they deserve it. Like him they are true belivers or power hungry idots, but that is no defense for being plain evil.
|
|
|
Post by nonentropic on Jul 25, 2022 9:48:48 GMT
My brother-in-law was a youth socialist member and attended the world convention here in Wellington NZ, understand decades ago. Most of the young ideological wets from around here were floored when the Ceausescu kids turned up in a private. Not long after a lead surprise got them.
More to follow I think.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jul 25, 2022 15:33:29 GMT
Evil deeds have been carried out by individuals throughout human history. They know no particular political persuasion and are uniquely personal. The "Good German" argument (or similar) does not carry much weight I think. The Nuremberg "Show" Trials only condemned the most illustrious as examples. Their ends are detailed in this rather grizzly account. Musselini, Ceausescu and innumerable others have met their ends through less organized means. Black shirts, Brown Shirts, Inquisition, mujahideen, and unnameable others, have all had their "career" paths. Christianity teaches that redemption is available to the "truely" repentant. Most(?) never truely repent. We are all responsible for our own actions.
|
|
|
Post by code on Jul 26, 2022 0:53:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Jul 26, 2022 1:18:02 GMT
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Jul 27, 2022 19:53:59 GMT
From WUWT: wattsupwiththat.com/2022/07/27/new-surface-stations-report-released-its-worse-than-we-thought/
"The Official U.S. Surface Temperature Record Remains Fatally Flawed, finds approximately 96 percent of U.S. temperature stations used to measure climate change fail to meet what the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) considers to be “acceptable” and uncorrupted placement by its own published standards."
This goes hand-in-hand with this "tweet" I posted in the 'Net Zero" thread last week:
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Jul 28, 2022 2:04:19 GMT
From WUWT: wattsupwiththat.com/2022/07/27/new-surface-stations-report-released-its-worse-than-we-thought/
"The Official U.S. Surface Temperature Record Remains Fatally Flawed, finds approximately 96 percent of U.S. temperature stations used to measure climate change fail to meet what the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) considers to be “acceptable” and uncorrupted placement by its own published standards."
This goes hand-in-hand with this "tweet" I posted in the 'Net Zero" thread last week: A crime against science. They don't care
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jul 28, 2022 3:17:17 GMT
From WUWT: wattsupwiththat.com/2022/07/27/new-surface-stations-report-released-its-worse-than-we-thought/
"The Official U.S. Surface Temperature Record Remains Fatally Flawed, finds approximately 96 percent of U.S. temperature stations used to measure climate change fail to meet what the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) considers to be “acceptable” and uncorrupted placement by its own published standards."
This goes hand-in-hand with this "tweet" I posted in the 'Net Zero" thread last week: A crime against science. They don't care Most of the government above the level of tradesman is a crime against science.
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Aug 11, 2022 12:41:52 GMT
From Peter Ridd's Facebook page detailing fraud and misconduct in research on the GBR .... the reef has NEVER been in danger (from anything except sunscreen). ReferencesLatest misconduct case: see Star marine ecologist committed misconduct, university saysFish and FoulFor the Lonnstedt case: SEA OF DOUBTSCan you spot the duplicates? Critics say these photos of lionfish point to fraudBoard for Investigation of Misconduct in Research (2017). Investigation Report Adopted by the Board for Investigation of Misconduct in Research. [online] Uppsala University. Available here: Investigation ReportFrom 2020: Ocean acidification does not impair the behaviour of coral reef fishes.Clark, T.D., Raby, G.D., Roche, D.G., Binning, S.A., Speers-Roesch, B., Jutfelt, F. and Sundin, J. (2020). Nature, 577(7790), pp.370–375.
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Aug 17, 2022 14:31:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Aug 17, 2022 19:31:12 GMT
Crocodile tears. Shed by those who are only sorry that that they got caught.
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Jul 15, 2023 22:08:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ratty on Aug 27, 2023 10:18:05 GMT
More scientific information can be found platogbr.com/Peter Ridd has been researching the Great Barrier Reef since 1984, has invented a range of advanced scientific instrumentation, and written over 100 scientific publications. Since being fired by James Cook University for raising concerns about science quality assurance issues,1 Peter Ridd works unpaid as an Adjunct Fellow in the Project for Real Science run by the Institute of Public Affairs. ipa.org.au/Also see realscience.org.au/See also Peter Ridd’s science facebook page www.facebook.com/DrPeterRidd
|
|